-
$25.00
Charles M. Linke. 2012. A Comment on the Albrecht Review of the Three Arguments Used to Justify Including a Risk-Premium in the Discount Factor. Journal of Legal Economics 19(1): 1-5
-
$25.00
Jennifer L. Polhemus. 2021. Book Review: Measuring Business Interruption Losses and Other Commercial Damages. Journal of Legal Economics 27(2): pp. 61–65.
-
$25.00
Lawrence M. Spizman. 2021. Comment on ‘‘Statistical Based Earnings Estimates: Further Reflections and Extension.’’ Journal of Legal Economics 27(2): pp. 93–98.
-
-
-
$25.00
Thomas R. Ireland and Frank L. Slesnick. 2021. Gamboa-Gibson Worklife Expectancy Methods and Tables: A Summary of Criticisms Since 2009. Journal of Legal Economics 27(2): pp. 43–60.
-
$25.00
David G. Tucek. (2012). Historical Net Discount Rates-An Update Through 2011. Journal of Legal Economics 19(1): pp. 89-111.
-
$25.00
Jerome S. Paige, Gregory Billings, and Subodh Mathur. 2021. Historical Net Discount Rates–An Update Through 2019. Journal of Legal Economics 27(2): pp. 79–92.
-
$25.00
Andrew Kraynak & David Schap. 2012. Historical Net Discount Rates: Amended and Reinterpreted. Journal of Legal Economics 19(1): pp. 17-36.
-
$25.00
Paul Sicilian. 2021. Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Statistical Based Earnings Estimates: Further Reflections and Extension.’’’ Journal of Legal Economics 27(2): pp. 99–108.
-
$25.00
Thomas F. Cargill and Eugenia Larmore. 2021. The Value of the Value of a Statistical Life in the Courtroom. Journal of Legal Economics 27(2): pp. 1–41.
-
$25.00
Thomas R. Ireland. 2012. Trends in Legal Decisions Involving Hedonic Damages from 2000 to 2012. Journal of Legal Economics 19(1): pp. 61-88
-
$25.00
James E. Ciecka. 2012. Ulpian’s Table and the Value of Life Annuities and Usufructs. Journal of Legal Economics 19(1): pp. 7-15
-
$25.00
Matthew J. Cushing & David I. Rosenbaum. (2012). Valuing Household Services: A New Look at the Replacement Cost Approach. Journal of Legal Economics 19(1): pp. 37-60
-
$25.00
N. C. Ostrofe. 2021. Why the Forensic Economic Valuation of Nighttime Protection and Care Services Has No Merit. Journal of Legal Economics 27(2): pp. 67–78.