A Review of Forensic Economic Issues Involved in Hambrook v. Smith
$25.00Thomas R. Ireland and James D. Rodgers. 2018. A Review of Forensic Economic Issues Involved in Hambrook v. Smith. Journal of Legal Economics 24(1-2): pp. 73– 93.
Showing all 8 results
Thomas R. Ireland and James D. Rodgers. 2018. A Review of Forensic Economic Issues Involved in Hambrook v. Smith. Journal of Legal Economics 24(1-2): pp. 73– 93.
N. C. Ostrofe. 2014. Does the Vocational Economic Rationale Have Merit? – An Appraisal. Journal of Legal Economics 20(1–2): pp. 61–83.
v3i3: pp. 43-56 Thomas R Ireland; James D Rodgers Personal Injury and wrongful death| Hedonic Damages 1993
Rodgers. 2012 Helpin v. Trustees of U. Penn: Lost Profits Not Discounted to Present Value in Pennsylvania Breach of Contract Cases. Journal of Legal Economics 18(2): pp. 79–92.
v8i1: pp. 1-40 James D Rodgers; Robert J Thornton Personal Injury and wrongful death| Personal Consumption 1998
v12i2: pp. 61-86 James E Ciecka; James D Rodgers; Gary R Skoog; Misc-Not classified 2002
v2i1: pp. 49-54 Thomas R Ireland; Walter D Johnson; James D Rodgers; Personal Injury and wrongful death| Hedonic Damages 1992
N. C. Ostrofe. 2021. Why the Forensic Economic Valuation of Nighttime Protection and Care Services Has No Merit. Journal of Legal Economics 27(2): pp. 67–78.
No products in the cart.